Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Ghana produces more Gold by 17% in 2012


Bars of Ghanaian Gold

Gold production in Ghana climbed to 4.2 million ounces from 3.6 million ounces in 2011, the 2012 figure beats the commission's forecast of 3.9 million ounces.
 
According to Ghana Minerals Commission, the increase in output was mainly due to rising prices that encouraged higher output by companies.

Gold prices averaged $1,668 an ounce in 2012 from $1,572 an ounce a year earlier. Production climbed to 4.2 million ounces from 3.6 million ounces in 2011, The 2012 figure beats the commission’s forecast of 3.9 million ounces.

Australian miner Adamus Resources poured its first gold in January last year. Newmont’s second gold mine at Akyem, located about 125 kilometres (80 miles) northwest of Accra is expected to start commercial production in 2013 with as much as 450,000 ounces annually.

Bauxite rose to 662,925 metric tons in 2012 from 410,918 tons a year earlier, Diamond output fell to 215,118 carats from 283,368 carat.

Johannesburg-based miners AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. and Gold Fields Ltd also operate in Ghana, which has West Africa’s second-biggest economy after Nigeria.

Ghana produced 2.97 million ounces of gold in 2010. Output was originally seen rising in 2011 but in the end shrunk as a number of firms focused on longer-term maintenance and expansion projects rather than maximising existing production.

Monday, March 25, 2013

Neo-Imperialistic trash!



Napoleon Bonaparte
By Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey
Why is it that France, from time to time, gets ideas above its station? Why is it that French Presidents, increasingly, start acting like failed Napoleons? Why is it that British Prime Ministers, while acting like war criminals, like to emulate the arch-war criminal, Churchill? Read on...

It is common knowledge that Napoleon, that French abomination who failed in his murderous attempt to spread French culture across Europe, liked to write letters to his lover, Josephine, asking her not to wash before they met so that he could smell the stench of her sweat, and...

 In plain English, a dirty little... Frenchman. It is also common knowledge that every time a Frenchman gets ideas above his station, Germany teaches him his place. In plain English, French foreign policy is as effective as the Maginot Line. Bluster, bravado, BANG!!

He who turns and runs away, comes back to run another day.

And as regards Churchill, the war criminal of the First World War, hated by London taxi drivers because he was known as a stingy son of a bitch; he sent millions to their deaths in 1914-1918 through utter incompetence (Gallipoli), his speeches were oiled with champagne and brandy, his legacy was the disintegration of the British Empire which he claimed to support. I say...this here is ours, and that there is yours, eh what? Bring me a ruler to draw a nice straight line on a map...

French President Francois Hollande
 And here we have François Hollande and David Cameron on yet another imperialist venture, this time trying to arm the Syrian terrorists who wish to murder men, women and children, impose Sharia law and kick Russia out of the Mediterranean, in return for greyish promises from Cameron and Hollande and their master across the seas.

And here we have the dynamic duo yet again, after they attempted to destroy the Jamahiriya in Libya, now threatening to "go it alone" after failing to convince their European Union peers to lift the arms embargo and provide the Syrian terrorists with weapons.

True, the Ministries of Defence in the UK and France will crow that they can provide tens of thousands of jobs and so wow, let's supply Indonesia with hundreds of millions of dollars of military hardware as they slaughter the Maubere population in East Timor. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, it happened. It happened and was documented in this column...

UK Premiere David Cmeron
François Hollande and David Cameron indeed emulate Napoleon and Churchill, Britain's version of everyone knows who... and like Napoleon and Churchill they both show a total disrespect for international law. You do not arm, aid and abet terrorists engaged in undermining the government of a sovereign state. It is illegal and it is proscribed as such under international law.

But then again, after Iraq, after Libya, who believes a word Paris and London say? And if they are not war criminals, then who is? But don't worry, The Hague ICC will never prosecute them... why, they are above the law, aren't they?

Development means Education




By Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey
The answer to the world's problems today lies not in deployment of troops and military hardware, not in strafing civilian structures so that contracts can be handed out among cronies, not in choosing a defenceless victim to destroy to create jobs at home, but rather, in development. And this means education.

And when we speak about education, we are speaking about gender equality because if we wish to describe our societies as progressive and inclusive, which work against marginalization and exclusion, then gender equality has to mean more than one pat-on-the-back, jump-on-the-bandwagon day in a year (International Women's Day, March 8). Only by including women in our societies, from the earliest stage - primary education - can we achieve sustainable development through the empowerment of women and gender equality policies.

However, in today's world, in the year 2013, barriers continue to exist, preventing women from having the same access as men to resources, rights, endowments and opportunities. In most countries, women are less likely than men to participate in the labor market; the percentage of female to male enrolment in primary and secondary education remains unequal. In some regions, the participation rates for males in the labor market exceed women's by over 50 per cent; women are more like to be engaged in vulnerable jobs; worldwide, the participation of women in the labor market, compared to men, is 68%.

 In a word, inequality. It starts at the beginning (primary education) and carries on right through the active professional period into old age. Women are less likely to receive an education, up to seventy per cent in some regions suffer some form of abuse, they are more likely to be victims of harassment, they are more likely to have dangerous jobs, they are more likely to be victims of human trafficking, they are more likely to be asked at the job interview "you aren't planning on having a family, ARE you?"

The good news is that statistics are improving but there remains far more to be done. A further positive step was taken this week at the Global Consultation on Education in the Post-2015 Development Agenda (March 18, in Dakar, Senegal), which commits itself to two fundamental principles:

Firstly, the right to quality education is a fundamental human right; secondly, education is envisaged as a public asset, therefore the State is the custodian of principles of education, paying attention to gender and social equality. In this way, we may yet achieve the Millennium Development Goals in 2015, under which six principles were drawn up by the initiative Education for All (EFA):

Goal 1
Expanding and improving comprehensive early childhood care and education, especially for the most vulnerable and disadvantaged children.

Goal 2
Ensuring that by 2015 all children, particularly girls, children in difficult circumstances and those belonging to ethnic minorities, have access to, and complete, free and compulsory primary education of good quality.

Goal 3
Ensuring that the learning needs of all young people and adults are met through equitable access to appropriate learning and life-skills programmes.

Goal 4
Achieving a 50 per cent improvement in levels of adult literacy by 2015, especially for women, and equitable access to basic and continuing education for all adults.

Goal 5
Eliminating gender disparities in primary and secondary education by 2005, and achieving gender equality in education by 2015, with a focus on ensuring girls' full and equal access to and achievement in basic education of good quality.

Goal 6
Improving all aspects of the quality of education and ensuring excellence of all so that recognized and measurable learning outcomes are achieved by all, especially in literacy, numeracy and essential life skills.

As usual, for every step taken forward, in other areas we slip back and UNESCO itself describes EFA as "an unfinished agenda" with millions of youths remaining illiterate, children out of school, drop-rates and learning difficulties soaring and the ensuing marginalization rates remaining high in many societies.

For the post-2015 agenda, UNESCO defends four basic principles, namely:
1. Concern for peace and sustainable development should be at the centre of efforts to promote inclusive and equitable development beyond 2015. Education for global citizenship is already included in many countries' curricula - but it needs to become a measureable goal.

2. Any post-2015 development framework must be of universal relevance and mobilize all countries, regardless of their -development status, around a common framework of goals aimed at inclusive and sustainable development.

3. The link between education and other development sectors must be strengthened: Education is an enabler for reaching all the Millennium Development Goals, but it is also dependent on progress in other policy areas.

4. A framework for learning in the 21st century must be elaborated that promotes the development of inclusive lifelong learning systems. 

By concentrating on education as a key driver towards sustainable development, insisting that gender equality be a reality and not a distant chimera, will our societies achieve the required levels of development to surpass our tremendous problems. Let us be honest: would so many men be killing each other and destroying infrastructures with weapons if more women were in positions of responsibility?

If not, then why are there only around 20% of women represented in national Parliaments?
Sources: UNO Millennium Development Goals
UNESCO Education for All
World Bank

Thursday, March 21, 2013

HIV Positive Women Appeal to Traditional Rulers for Protection



By GNA
Some HIV positive women in the Volta Region have appealed to traditional authorities in the vicinity to help uphold their rights.

The women, numbering about 15, also called on the chiefs and queen mothers to use all platforms available to them to educate their subjects against the stigmatisation of persons living with HIV.

The appeal was made at a cultural dialogue meeting organised by the International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA),Ghana.

According to the women, stigma is still a major obstacle to their right to association, work, inheritance and ownership of property, including those they acquired themselves.

They complained that stigmatization is preventing a lot of people from testing voluntarily. The women also revealed that some persons who have tested HIV positive refuse to declare their statuses and resort to indiscriminate sex.

They also called on the traditional rulers to regulate the activities of some known herbalists who falsely claim they have abilities to cure HIV.

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

KENYA – HOW THE WEST LOST AN ELECTION

Prime Minister Raila Odinga and US Veep Joe Biden pose for the cameras
By Yaw Sakosablig
Future generations will look back on the 4 March 2013 elections in Kenya and ask how the coalition of the indomitable Prime Minister Raila Odinga and Vice President Kalonzo Musyoka could have lost this election?

After all, all the opinion polls showed that their CORD alliance was leading. However, by late February, 2013, certain trends were beginning to emerge, which showed that the alliance between the President elect, Honorable Uhuru Kenyatta, and his vice in the coalition, Hon William Ruto, were going to spring a surprise. I will hazard some guess here.

Firstly, the Western alliance in Kenya, led by the US Embassy, is known to be vibrant and noisy. This alliance includes the British High Commission, the Canadian High Commission and other Security Council wanabeees of different sorts.

Late last year, these Embassies held a press conference to complain that they had no access to President Mwai Kibaki, while the Chinese held all the glory. The Western alliance brought in a Deputy Minster known as John Carson (an African American) to warn Kenyans that electing Uhuru Kenyata and William Ruto, “will have consequences”. This emboldened other western Ambassadors who waded into the fray with threats of their own. “We are not even allowed to talk to them”, one said despondently. Some commentators in Nairobi have said that this was the point at which neocolonial interventions have heir Achilles heel.  
ICC Logo
 The International Criminal Court’s indictment of the two leading youthful contenders is seen in some sections of Kenyan society as engineered by the CORD alliance led by Prime Minister Raila Odinga. Some point to a letter written by the Secretary General of the Orange Democratic Movement, asking the Security Council not to defer the cases of the Ocampo 4 (now 3) as they are known in Kenya. Generally, it is felt that some sections of the Kenyan ruling class engineered to have the two most youthful political leaders encamped in the Hague to give Hon Raila a free ride to power. Of course, he has denied this.

However, the sympathy coming from the “consequences” warning was palpable. The West have never understood Africans. To get involved in an African in such direct way, was bound to rebound on their perceived supporter. They contributed to Hon Raila’s down fall in a major way. One weakness of the approach by Western alliance in Nairobi was the use of Nairobi based civil society organizations, who have no foothold in the rural areas, did not take part in either civic or voter education, and spent valuable time in writing pro ICC articles, taking court actions, etc. They have also tried to muzzle any discussion on the ICC which does not take their narrative on global justice.

During the Kenyan elections, civic and voter education was left to small community and faith based organizations, which were invaluable in helping citizens to make the right choices.

There were those who felt that television adverts could promote awareness. In the rural areas, radio was more effective. Incidentally, most of these Nairobi based organizations were sympathetic to the CORD Alliance, and will have to explain to their financiers how they helped to lose the elections; and how they have been unable to mobilise public opinion in support of the ICC despite the heavy western investment.
The Western interventionist approach allowed President elect Uhuru Kenyatta to position himself as pro Kenya, anti-neocolonial, and anti-imperialist, even if he did not use those words. He talked about Kenya being a sovereign state, about allowing Kenyans to choose their own destiny, and the youth of Kenya to be given a chance. This resonated with many Kenyan youth.
Raila Odinga weeping
The CORD alliance was therefore seen as protégés of the west, golden oldies doing the bidding of the West, with all its implications for the Kenyan economy and society. What is true is that the West is threatening to impose sanctions on the Kenyan economy because they made a democratic choice in the interest of Kenya.
Some democrats indeed.

While these external factors were important, it is the internal dynamics of the parties that worked in favour of the winners.

Firstly, the Jubilee Alliance of Uhuru and Ruto was much more youthful, had a dynamic, people focused programme, while the CORD Alliance was caught up in old excuses. For instance, during the Presidential debate, Uhuru Kenyatta was focused, clear, passionate, and charismatic. Prime Minister Raila Odinga, was still spouting history, and promising to bring the cases at The Hague ‘back home”.

Another Presidential aspirant, Hon Martha Karua exposed this position. The Jubilee Alliance was also present in several parts of the country, working day and night to get the votes out. The Manifesto of the Jubilee Alliance had some substance, which also worked in their favour. Some people have attributed this to the huge budget available to the Jubilee Coalition, but history is replete with examples where the rich contestants have not been elected, so there is more to this victory than the riches of the Kenyatta family.
Kenya President-Elect Uhuru Kenyatta
 Finally, a theory which has been discussed time and again in Kenya is
the “Tyranny of numbers” theory, which before the elections, was seen as problematic. Yet there is evidence to show that ethnic groups’ tribes which are huge sometimes tend to use these numbers to win elections. The ‘tyranny of numbers’ theory therefore had it that because the Jubilee Alliance had supported among certain ethnic groups, they could rely on these numbers to win the election. Those who disputed this theory now have eggs on their faces.

However, it is also true that some candidates for county positions were not elected on the bases of ethnicity.

All said, the West has not learned that African has come of age. Old colonial type interventions used by the West in Kenya did not work and will not work. Threats of sanctions and threats against individuals who have rejected the western narrative on the ICC will not work either.

Local issues were far more important than any other issue in this election. President elect Uhuru Kenyata showed that the sovereign interest of Kenya is more important, and it appears that Kenyans agree with him.