By Wayne Madsen
In what has become a self-fulfilling
prophecy by the US Africa Command (AFRICOM) and various neo-conservative think
tanks, the Pan-Sahel region of North Africa is rapidly falling under the
control of extremist forces, most notably Ansar Dine in Mali, Boko Haram in
northern Nigeria, and “al Qaeda” in the Maghreb (AQIM). However, it has become
apparent that the funding for these groups originates in the Wahhabist-ruled
potentates of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates.
When the Libyan rebellion against Muammar Qaddafi first began in Benghazi, the capital of Wahhabist-influenced Cyrenaica, the Libyan leader was ridiculed for claiming that “al-Qaeda” rebels were involved with the uprising. However, it has become quite clear that the core group of the Libyan rebels in Benghazi and surrounding towns, were, in fact, composed of Libyan and other mujaheddin guerrillas from Afghanistan, many of whom fought for Osama Bin Laden and the Taliban.
French intelligence and exiled Saudi
democratic opposition leaders in London pinpointed the current Saudi Crown
Prince, Salman bin Abdulaziz al Saud, as the major nexus for mujaheddin
traveling to Pakistan and Taliban-controlled Afghanistan to fight on behalf of
bin Laden and the Taliban in the years prior to the 9/11 attack on the United
States. Salman, as Governor of Riyadh, allegedly provided air tickets, hotel
rooms, and cash to mujaheddin transiting through Riyadh on their way to
Peshawar and across the border into Taliban Afghanistan. Later, a few of the
veterans of Afghanistan traveled to Iraq, where they engaged US and allied
forces after the ouster of Saddam Hussein. After Iraq, some of the mujaheddin
ended up in Benghazi as the vanguard in the rebellion against Qaddafi.
US Sponsored Terrorist Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi |
Libyan rebel commander Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi admitted in an interview with the
Italian newspaper, Il Sole 24 Ore, said they had fought in Iraq and were al-Qaeda
veterans. Al-Hasidi told the paper that the al-Qaeda veterans, who fought with
the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, were “good Muslims and are fighting against
the invader.” Al-Hasidi was captured in 2002 in Peshawar, Pakistan and handed
over to the United States. The US released Al-Hasidi in 2008 and he eventually
showed up in Libya to lead the uprising against Qaddafi. Al-Hasidi’s
connections to Al Qaeda and the NATO-backed uprising in Libya provide yet more
evidence of collusion between the United States, Al Qaeda, Saudi Arabia, and,
considering the support for the rebels offered by leading French Zionist,
Bernard-Henri Levy, Israel. The Libyan Fighting Group and al-Qaeda veterans are
known to have received the financial backing, as well as arms, from Saudi
Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE.
The al-Qaeda connection with the
NATO-backed Libyan rebels means that Qaddafi was spot on when he stated that
al-Qaeda was a major participant in the Libyan uprising. Many of the al-Qaeda
guerrillas later traveled from Libya to Syria to participate in the Syrian
uprising against President Bashar al-Assad.
Currently, the same mujaheddin forces that have gained a firm footing in Libya, are providing support to like-minded extremists in Nigeria, Mali, Niger, Mauritania, and other states in the Sahel.
From new bases in Libya, these
mujaheddin, who continue to receive support from the Wahhabist regimes in the
Persian Gulf, are taking part in operations in support of Boko Haram in Nigeria
and Ansar Dine and AQIM in Mali.
The Tuareg-led and secularist Movement for the National Liberation of Azawad (MNLA), which has declared the independence of northern Mali as a Tuareg state, has appealed to the West to help it defeat Ansar Dine, AQIM, and Boko Haram forces who have been busy destroying Islamic sites honoring Muslim saints in Timbuktu (known as the City of 333 Saints), Gao, and Kidan that are protected as World Heritage sites by the U.N. Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The pillaging is reminiscent of the Wahabbist destruction of Islamist shrines of saints and grave sites in Medina following the Saudi takeover of Hejaz after the fall of the Ottoman Empire.
However, the United Nations has
shown no interest in authorizing intervention in northern Mali by the Economic
Community of West African States (ECOWAS), AFRICOM, or anyone else. The United
States and NATO, which have found themselves not only allied with, but
supporting Al Qaeda in Libya and Syria, are content to allow the
Wahhabist-backed extremists destroy ancient Muslim shrines, just as they took
no action against the Saudi and Emirati-backed Taliban’s destruction of the
ancient Buddha statues in Bamiyan, Afghanistan in March 2001, six months before
the 9/11 attack.
It is clear, once again, that the West is using Al Qaeda as a proxy force to destabilize the Sahel in the interest of a later full-scale military intervention on the terms of NATO and the [Persian]Gulf Cooperation Council. The casualties will be the people of the region, not the billionaire potentates who direct such activities from their luxurious palaces in Riyadh, Jeddah, Doha, Abu Dhabi, and Dubai.
No comments:
Post a Comment